Curated by
Anthony Greiter
Speaker coach for scientists & tech founders. Anthony Greiter helps brilliant people become unforgettable on stage — turning complex ideas into presentations that convert, powered by his AGENT Method and 40/30/1 Rule.
stacklist.com/anthony
Speaker coach for scientists & tech founders. Anthony Greiter helps brilliant people become unforgettable on stage — turning complex ideas into presentations that convert, powered by his AGENT Method and 40/30/1 Rule.
More in Visualize Your Evidence
See all 27 →How to Optimize Courtroom Visuals to Support Expert Witness Testimony | Advocacy Digital Media
advocacydm.com
Effective Demonstrative Exhibits
Expert Report Graphics vs Trial Graphics
persuadius.com
More from Anthony Greiter
See all stacks →A Bookshelf to Kill Boring Shit
4 cards · Books
Deck Design for People Who Know Things
7 cards · Education
TED and TEDx: What Scientists Need to Know
8 cards · Education
Substantive, Demonstrative, or Illustrative? | Colorado Lawyer
This article by Lois R. Lupica and Charlotte Goodenow explores the distinctions between substantive, demonstrative, and illustrative evidence in the context of democratizing access to justice. The piece aims to clarify these legal concepts to support broader understanding and equitable participation in the justice system.
Built for AI agentsACO · 20 tokens
Summary
This article by Lois R. Lupica and Charlotte Goodenow explores the distinctions between substantive, demonstrative, and illustrative evidence in the context of democratizing access to justice. The piece aims to clarify these legal concepts to support broader understanding and equitable participation in the justice system.
Tags
access-to-justice · legal-evidence · substantive-law · demonstrative-evidence · illustrative-evidence · democratizing-justice
Key entities
Lois R. Lupica (person, 0.95) · Charlotte Goodenow (person, 0.95) · Access to Justice (concept, 0.9) · Substantive Evidence (concept, 0.8) · Demonstrative Evidence (concept, 0.8) · Illustrative Evidence (concept, 0.8) · Democratizing Justice (concept, 0.85)
Classification
analysis · language en · status final
Provenance
claude-opus-4-6 via @stacklist/mcp-server@2.0.0, confidence 0.85, 17 Aug 2026